Julie's profileFAIRNY VIEW e-sc...PhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
|
May 05 Australian Labor Day Weekend 2007 in Ipswich, Qld.
She was a tiny Sheila, Mrs Miller, Yet fought her whole life for the Rights Of Man and of course the female folk too. Not shy to stand up for a womans sufferage To cast a vote, and live a life safe and secure Her humanism and solidarity to the Labor cause Against the greed and might of treacherous Capitalists remains true to this day.
Emma was firm in her mission of a better life For the battlers, the women and children who Were paupers on less than a minimum wage, Who could ill afford a loaf of bread After paying the rent in rat infested squalor On the flood-traps of the Brisbane river.
Her weapon was to use her intelligence, but When push came to shove, she drew out Her hat-pin and stuck it in the Commissioners horse Who barred her way to petition the Premier that day.
The powers that be took a fall, but not before They'd trounced on the right to march In city streets, shouting, Cop that! Swinging and swooping down on the masses With their batons.
1900 seems so long ago but the message of Emma Miller Is clear - Not to lay idle when there's people suffering The tyranny of bullies and bastards Who use their power and money to entrench inequality.
There was no way that the 'Grand Old Lady' was Inferior as she took on the hierachy! True and loyal to the cause, she was a giant amongst women And men, even though she was only 4ft 10inch tall!
She travelled and inspired from Toowoomba to Charleville In a carriage, organising campaigns and Events like no other, so we must remember and Honour the lady who led the struggle up the steps To Legislative chambers.
(C) copyright Julie McNeill 2006March 29 IT'S A FREE MEDIA - ISN'T IT? TOO BLOODY RIGHT!I heard prospective Senator from Ipswich on Radio National today - It's a Free Media, right? - But what the bloody hell is happening? Never thought I'd hear P.H. campaigning on the ABC. The announcer was polite to the Honourable gentlemen. Didn't say ON YER BIKE like he did to the peasants that called in who disagreed with him. WHATS THE BLOODY DEAL? I asked my Brummy self. Who the hell is this Enoch who doesn't like the sight of black people....I had a crush on Easton Shaw from my school. He was the best soccer player. He was smart and good looking and he was nice, a bit shy. His sister was my best friend and they were black as the ace of spades. My mum said I wasn't to go out with a black boy because everyone would say I was black mans bait from then on and ruin my chances to be a bride. BULLSHIT MUM I said to myself. I had read MARTIN LUTHER KING in the school library and he and I had a dream. I read it out loud and strong for school assembly and played the song, "what we need is a great big melting pot, big enough, big enough, to take the world and all its got, keep on stirring for a hundred years or more, to turn out coffee coloured people by the score!" That was one answer I supposed, but we could all live with each other in peace and understanding and mutual respect. Very simple - but why didn't people try it? Thirty-five years later in a veil of tears, menopause and BLEEDING, RUDDY(Nan said that's the polite way of saying bloody) Pauline Hanson is invited onto radio to warn those Muslims and Asians not to bloody come here(no matter what the billboards say). It was alright for me of course, being a white Pom who could breed more whiteys but my daughter has now met a black African-white-Anglo-Indian man whose family was colonised and worked for the bleedin' British, then fled from Bloody Idi Amin to their Colonial capital, tried to get on with life when every bloody where was the sound of the Nationl bloody Front marching. I'm white, I'm Australian, Pauline, but will you lynch me when I say - I hate the bloody Aussie flag - I always have, with the bleedin' Union Jack. Makes me cringe - what do you say to that, you bleeding Fascist - why don't you go over bloody there, where you came from and get off my bloody radion station. Bloodies in the Bible, Bloodies in the Book, if you don't bloody believe me, have a bloody look !(Tiverton Rd. Primary School Playground, 1972)January 22 Freedom of, and Freedom from ReligionINSIGHT ON SECULARISM AND THE ROLE OF RELIGION ON OUR LEGISLATION Monday 22nd January, 2007 - Ipswich North&Suburbs branch meeting. Discussion facilitator, Julie McNeill.
With the increasing influence and public monies going towards religious organisations for provision of health and welfare services to the general public, I - as a free thinker - would like us to reflect, research and discuss the role that religions ought to have on our evolution as a secular society. It is vital that the Australian Labor Party be clear about this in relation to the messages, policies and programs we present to Australia at the next election. The separation of State and Church is seen as a fundamental key to maintaining a cohesive, inclusive and progressive society.
Points to consider: 1. Australian Constitution: Henry Higgins(Lawyer, committed Secularist and public campaigner against compulsory Religious Education in State Schools(1900) recognised the need to have Freedom of, and Freedom from, Religion. He was instrumental in putting into our Constitution that 116. The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth. Justice Lionel Murphy stated that Section 116 contained a great right, and ‘great rights’, are often expressed in simple phrases. ‘It would detract greatly from the freedom of and from religion guaranteed by those clauses if they were to be read narrowly.’ To interpret this section as prohibiting only the establishment of a single religion is to mis-read it: the section refers to the establishment of any religion. It works thus as a guarantee of freedom from religion, as well as of religion. 2. Life & Death and everything in between. THE ROLE OF GENDER POLITICS - THE PERSONAL IS STILL POLITCAL I've had a fair share of my personal views and experiences covered in the local papers lately, in relation to the increasing trend of the Howard Government to throw money to religious organisations for public welfare and health services, eg. chaplains in state schools, pregnancy counselling, buying/running public hospitals with religious doctrine as policy. I am passionate about this issue because the effect on our lives of religious beliefs has and can impact on our experience of suffering and achieving our potential as human beings.(Consider the millions of victims of HIV in SE Asia and the Pacific, Africa whose Church will not promote the use of condoms). There is always the contest of ideas, but what the guiding principles of secularism does is promote the integrity of each man and woman to take responsibility and to use the knowledge and evidence of Science for our best interests. As a woman I will gather the facts and make the decision about what is best for me in particular to my body in life, unto death. Feelings aren't facts, so my spiritual side is that side of the brain which is stimulated by a sense of oneness and the kalaidescope of imagination that creates and finds beauty. I wrote a poetry performance show in Melbourne which described the sacred joy and wonder of conceiving a child, but I also intuitively knew when I couldn't bare another. No man can dictate to me because of his interpretation of an ancient text I respect - but don't believe in myself. For 200 years in the Black Country my grandmothers followed their men with their barrows full of kids from mine to mine till menopause set in. In 1847 my Great Great Great Grandmother Ann Brothwood was in the Wolverhampton Union Poor House and made to wear a special mark on her uniform to show she was a wicked unwed mother. In 1938 my nan gave birth to a baby girl whilst in domestic service so my grandparents bought the child up as their own and nobody knew of her shame untill 1982. My nan got married to a Higgins, whose Irish parents had dropped the O' so nobody would discriminate against them, so by the time my dad grew up in the 1950's he was full of the Protestant British Empire who couldn't trust the lazy Paddies, not realising until I told him his roots were from Ireland, and he vilified his own! In 1941 my mother was born in Father Hudsons Home and told she didn't belong to anybody. Even God rejected her because she was a bastard ' even to the 10th generation' (Deuteronomy), but the Church, then shipped her out to New South Wales to be trained for domestic labour. The long term effects of such treatment by Church and State I submitted to the Senate Enquiry reports of the Forgotten Australians. Enough about me! What about you? share your views and thoughts on the subject... 3. WHERE TO FROM HERE? How does the Branch collectively view the role of religion on our legislation and policies that provide for the public good? Shall we prepare a motion to go to State Office?
Julie McNeill - Fernvale
blog 2: I am so promiscuous I also have a myspace where I keep in touch with FRIENDS, FAMILY and other familiars, so have a geek, join us at www.blog.myspace.com/jewelsescape
November 01 Howards hare-brain ideasOn the day that the Mufti of Lakemba Mosque was being put in the stocks by our Media and Politicians over his attitudes to women and his influence on hundreds of young Muslim men, and on the day the Pope was trying to get to grips with the rampant abuses on children by priests over the years, our Prime Minister suddenly has all this money to say the best thing for our young people to help deal with their problems was religious counsellors!
Read my point of view published in the newspaper, below.
June 23 Student supportSubmission to Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education
Inquiry into student income support
Submitter: Julie Patricia McNeill
Submission to Senate Inquiry into Student Support – by Julie P. McNeill (Qld). I am a parent of two daughters, Haley aged 19 and Jasmine 17yrs. My husband and I are very concerned about their welfare because in order to study for a tertiary qualification in their chosen field, they have to leave home at the end of Year 12 as there is no public transport where we live They are penalized because our income is taken into account for Youth Allowance. The government is being unreasonable in expecting us to financially support our children when they leave home to pursue their further education. Our average combined income is $50,000 p.a. We filled in a thick Centrelink booklet accounting for every dollar that is spent on our household – house payments, utilities, school fees for our youngest, clothing, medications, two twenty year old cars repairs, maintenance and running costs, groceries, vet bills, solar hot water service payments, rates and water. We haven’t had a proper holiday in years and rarely go out for dinner or theatre & movies while we have been paying for our daughters to go to an Independent school due to the State School not having relevant Science, Maths and language subjects. Our commitment to their education has been of highest priority. My oldest daughter Haley moved out to start a Science degree at Queensland University then transferred to QUT in Brisbane to do a Bachelor of Nursing. She gets a pittance for Youth Allowance(including Rent assistance) of $75.00 per fortnight. Her casual employment in a food court making kebabs has earned her approximately $8,000.00 over the time she has been supporting herself. I ask the Australian Parliament, how Haley can be expected to study effectively for her degree on this amount of money? Where did the rationale come from that says my daughters are not independent when they leave home to study full-time and work casual hours to make up the shortfall from a miserly government assistance? We can’t afford to support them financially. How did earning $16,000 mean they were now independent, and living away from home for 18 months suddenly class them as independent and not before? While my daughter has consistently worked a minimum of 20hrs a week she has not got up to that amount of money through no fault of her own. It is impossible to earn more money because she has to fit in attending classes and lectures. It doesn’t make sense that the government doesn’t assist full-time students considering the real circumstance of their autonomy.. It is confusing that her friends who can work through a family business be paid wages to meet the Centrelink criteria so they get full Youth Allowance. This is penalizing students like my daughters who do not have family companies that can design income to match Centrelink criteria, and have to survive on a menial income to get through University. We help when we can, by paying for University fees, books and sometimes transport costs so this puts a stress on our expenses, and our marriage when we are thwarted in our desire to create a secure future for our retirement. I am perplexed by the bombardment of messages from our politicians for my husband and I to prepare the way for our old age, yet have our children as dependents to the age of twenty-five years! Now that we are middle-aged we would like to make personal contributions to superanuation,( and have the government give some to match), and we would like to trade in our old cars that can’t take ethanol petrol because it harms the engine. Our main goal is to pay off our house. Yes we want to do these things and more, but we are expected to pay for our children when they’ve left home to study for a career. Neither is happening because it doesn’t add up. My husband and I thought that once the girls left home they would be assisted financially by government until they got a job at the end of their studies. After-all my oldest daughter who is presently studying to be a registered nurse is going to be in a job which is highly sought after and have continuous employment. She will be more than paying back her student Youth Allowance and contributing to society through her taxes(not forgetting the HECS debt she will have to pay back before she can consider buying a car or even her own house.) I fear that the present parental obligations and independence criteria’s are hopelessly inadequate. They are negative obstacles to effective learning and maintaining good physical and mental health. Working too many hours at work, and meeting the pressures of study and exams are unfair. Haley is a very conscientious student yet has to miss lectures because she needs all the money she can get. I hope that the struggle to survive won’t deter her from finishing her degree. Again, I ask the legislators to be change the policy which does not classify my daughters as independent, full-time students eligible for the full amount of Youth Allowance they deserve.
|
|
|